Skip Navigation, Sitemap

Slough Observer

Published: Friday, 24th April, 2009 12:00pm

Campaigners' anger at 'wasted' £25k

Comments (1) | Print | Email

CAMPAIGNERS fighting to save Slough town hall from being demolished have slammed the council for reportedly spending more than £25,000 of public funds to prevent the building from becoming Grade II listed.

Campaign to Save Slough's Heritage, the group set up in response to the council's decision to tear down the building, have accused ‘greedy' councillors of irresponsibly squandering taxpayers money to fulfill their own political needs.

Campaign co-founder Martin Gibbons said: "We are shocked that the council has spent so much public money on expensive consultants to write useless reports given the harsh economic times.

"We question whether this is a good use of public funds given that independent experts from English Heritage have already recommended that the building should be Grade II listed and protected.

"With the council considering cuts in jobs and services, we think there are far better uses for such a large amount of money which would go a long way towards maintaining the magnificent historic town hall so future generations can enjoy Slough's most loved building."

Council leader Rob Anderson insisted that the money was not wasted. He said: "The money was spent to obtain an expert opinion.

The council did not seek a listing for the building but once we learnt of this we had a duty to reply in an informed manner."

The Campaign has been at loggerheads with the council since Cabinet members agreed last year to tear down the structure built in 1936 to make way for new property development.

To find out more about the Campaign visit www.savesloughtownhall.co.uk

Register for email alerts
  • Roohi Khan
    (Unregistered User)


    Apr 26 09 21:55

    Our Ref: 3380
    Please this ref number if you wish to report this comment.
    Report this comment

    This is what I call DIRTY POLITICS. I don't understand whats wrong with Council. Why they can not take their own decissions? Why they have to take others opinions? Don't tell me they seeked the opinion from People 1st! Who have already put hundreds of people unders stress and deprission with their costs charging Leaseholders to refurbish their buildings. From one hand they are getting funds like £45M and another £7M for decent homes plans, and from other hands they are charging fortune amounts to Leaseholders. I don't understand why Council is ignoring its responsbility. I think someone is wrong at wrong place in Council.

commentsComments

Any abusive comments or comments with swearing or racist undertones will be removed from this site.

Any comments urging people to vote for specific political parties will be deleted as spam

Post a comment

*required

*required




Captcha Image, filename

For your convenience, you can now register with our website (which will save you from having to retype your name each time you post a comment). If you would like to do this (or have already!) then please Log in or Register

Photosales Search

Time for Christmas

News from around Berkshire